top of page
Search

The "Influencer Tax": How YouTubers Turned Our Junk into Luxury Gear

  • Writer: Yiannis Yiasaris
    Yiannis Yiasaris
  • 6 days ago
  • 3 min read

Once upon a time, if you found an old 5-megapixel digital camera in your junk drawer, you’d give it to your toddler nephew just so he could smash it against a wall for fun. Today, if you still have it, congratulations: you’re holding a small fortune. Welcome to the era of the "Digicam Revival", where logic went out the window and TikTok took the wheel.

The Artist Cosplay and the "Organic Grain" Scam


You can’t be a photography influencer without the uniform: oversized pants, a beanie (even in 90-degree heat), and a camera hanging from your chest more like jewelry than a tool. But the real comedy starts when they hit "record" to explain the "why," using the magic word: "Organicity."

Let’s be real: from an artistic standpoint, in capable hands, the flaws of an old sensor can indeed become a creative asset. A photographer who knows what they’re doing can exploit the unique color rendering of an old CCD to create something truly special. However, 99% of what we see on YouTube doesn't fall into this category. There, the "film look" is just an excuse for technical incompetence. They label muddy colors and blown-out highlights as "artistic vision" just to feel "edgy." No, my friend. Just because your photo looks like CCTV footage from a car wash doesn't make it art.

The "Street Photography" of Our Patience

This is where science gives up. 99% of these reviews claim to be about "street photography," but the concept of the street has been stretched dangerously thin. You see the influencer wandering around with a Ricoh GR or a Fuji—cameras designed to be invisible and lightning-fast in the hands of real moment-hunters—and turning them into mere props for their vlog.

Their "sample work"? A random flowerpot, a rusty fence, or the classic: the back of an unsuspecting pedestrian. Entirely indifferent photos, lacking composition, subject, or the "decisive moment," which they pompously label as "urban storytelling." Let’s be clear: walking on a sidewalk with an expensive camera doesn't make you a street photographer. It just makes you a pedestrian with expensive taste, holding a legendary camera without the slightest clue what to do with it. It’s heartbreaking to see tools that made history in the hands of a Daido Moriyama being used today as a "vibe" to mask artistic emptiness.

The Real Victim: The "Homeless" Photographer

This is where the joke ends. Behind the influencer lights and the eBay scalpers, there’s the real photographer—the one who didn't buy the camera for the outfit, but because it’s their tool.

The amateur who for years had learned to work with a specific old Ricoh or an old Fuji now finds themselves in a dead end. It used to be a five-minute fix: if your camera broke, you’d check the classifieds and for $100 you’d have an identical one to continue your work the next day. Today, that safety net is gone. The real user is exiled from their own market. Replacing a broken camera is now financially insane, as the same model sells at "collector prices" just because YouTube said so.

Conclusion: Don't Fall into the Trap


The message is simple: Don't let artificial hype dictate how you express yourself. Photography is about emotion and the eye, not a stock market race on eBay. Don't rush to spend a fortune to buy someone else's "vibe."

Be patient. Don't fall into the "now or never" trap. Fashion is inherently fleeting; eventually, the "TikTok collectors" will get bored and move on to the next shiny object. Somewhere out there, in an old camera shop or a forgotten ad, there’s a camera waiting for you. It will find its way into your hands at the right price and the right time, ready to be a tool again, not an accessory. Until then, go out and shoot with whatever you have. The street is there, and it doesn't care about your camera model.



 
 
 

Comments


© 2026 YIANNIS YIASARIS

bottom of page